Master Race, Race Betterment, Eugenics, and Euthenics for world Justice

In London, a series of thought-provoking and contentious weekly discussion meetings are being held by the African Diaspora Equity and Justice Alliance (ADEJA). The central focus of these meetings is the figure of John Canoe/Junkanoo, a mythical character who has been controversially posited as a symbol for delivering reparatory justice to individuals classified as Black and Mixed-Black worldwide. These discussions delve into the complex and often contentious topics surrounding race betterment, eugenics, euthenics, and the application of British values in these contexts. This article will explore the various dimensions of these discussions, including the historical and mythical aspects of John Canoe/Junkanoo, the rationale behind the different positions held by participating groups, and the broader implications for race and reparatory justice.

John Canoe/Junkanoo, a mythical character with deep roots in Afro-Caribbean history, is at the heart of ADEJA's discussions. This figure is being utilized to symbolize a reimagined framework for reparatory justice aimed at individuals classified as Black and Mixed-Black. The choice of John Canoe/Junkanoo is steeped in historical and cultural significance, which adds layers of complexity to the debate.

John Canoe/Junkanoo is a character rooted in the cultural traditions of the Caribbean, particularly in the Bahamas and Jamaica. Historically, Junkanoo is a festival with origins in African slave communities in the Caribbean, celebrated with vibrant costumes, music, and dance. The festival is named after John Canoe, a mythical figure who represents a fusion of African and Caribbean traditions. This character embodies resistance, resilience, and cultural preservation.

ADEJA's use of John Canoe/Junkanoo as a symbol for reparatory justice is intended to leverage the historical and cultural weight of this figure to galvanize support for their cause. By aligning their mission with the legacy of John Canoe/Junkanoo, ADEJA aims to create a powerful narrative around the need for reparatory justice for Black and Mixed-Black individuals.

In the ongoing discussions, there are two primary factions with differing viewpoints: Group A and Group B. Their perspectives on how John Canoe/Junkanoo should influence the movement for reparatory justice are fundamentally at odds.

Group A advocates for the integration of race betterment, eugenics, and euthenics into the framework for reparatory justice. They argue that these concepts are essential for the establishment of an international legal personality that can effectively deliver reparatory justice. According to Group A:

• Race Betterment, Eugenics, and Euthenics: Group A believes that these concepts must be revisited and adapted for the greater good of mankind. They argue that enhancing racial identity and improving racial characteristics are vital for creating a robust international legal personality. They assert that race betterment and eugenics can contribute to societal progress and the effective distribution of reparations.
• Property Ownership and Identity: They claim that identity, linked to racial classification, is a prerequisite for property ownership. By reinforcing racial identity, they argue, individuals can reclaim their historical and cultural property that was taken from them.
• UK Leadership: Group A also suggests that the UK, with its superior intellectual resources and historical perspective on race, should lead the global efforts in reparatory justice, surpassing the leadership of Black Americans.

Group B opposes the integration of race betterment, eugenics, and euthenics into the reparatory justice framework. They emphasize a more cautious and ethical approach, advocating for the following:

• Historical Awareness: Group B stresses the importance of remembering the historical and ongoing struggles of Black people worldwide. They argue that promoting eugenics and race betterment could risk repeating historical injustices and undermine the ethical foundations of reparatory justice.
• International Support: They insist that the establishment of an international legal personality for reparatory justice should only proceed if all nations and international entities that recognize race are supportive of this initiative. This cautious approach aims to ensure that reparatory justice is pursued in a manner that respects human rights and historical sensitivities.

The concept of identity is central to the arguments presented by Group A and Group B. For Group A, identity linked to racial classification is seen as crucial for property ownership. They argue that a clear racial identity is necessary for claiming reparatory justice and restoring historical rights.

In contrast, Group B emphasizes that focusing on racial identity could perpetuate discriminatory ideologies and undermine efforts to address historical injustices in a more inclusive and equitable manner. They argue that reparatory justice should be grounded in universal human rights and historical acknowledgment rather than race-based criteria.

The concept of race is recognized by various nations and international entities, albeit in different ways. Understanding which countries and organizations officially recognize race is essential for comprehending the global context of ADEJA's mission.

• United Nations (UN): The UN acknowledges racial categories in its efforts to combat racism and promote human rights. The UN's International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) reflects this recognition.
• European Union (EU): The EU has frameworks for addressing racial discrimination and promoting equality, including the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI).
• African Union (AU): The AU's initiatives focus on addressing racial and ethnic disparities within Africa, promoting unity and development among African nations.

These entities recognize race in various contexts, including statistical purposes, policy-making, and human rights advocacy. Their recognition influences how reparatory justice initiatives like ADEJA's can be framed and pursued.

Reparation Fascism, a term used to describe the controversial position associated with John Canoe/Junkanoo, refers to an ideology that combines elements of racial betterment with reparatory justice. This concept implies a focus on improving racial characteristics and applying eugenic principles within the framework of reparations.

• Racial Enhancement: Reparation Fascism advocates for enhancing racial characteristics to achieve societal progress, often linked to controversial eugenic ideas.
• Historical Justice: It seeks to address historical injustices through a framework that incorporates both reparations and racial betterment, potentially leading to conflicts with ethical and human rights standards.

ADEJA, the African Diaspora Equity and Justice Alliance, is a movement dedicated to advancing reparatory justice for Black and Mixed-Black individuals. Their mission encompasses several key objectives:

• Advancement of Reparatory Justice: ADEJA aims to secure reparations for historical injustices faced by Black and Mixed-Black individuals, based on evidence and historical claims.
• Cultural Restoration: The movement also focuses on restoring cultural identity and preserving cultural heritage for affected communities.
• Utilization of IC Codes: ADEJA employs the British Police IC codes for racial and ethnic classification to facilitate its reparatory justice claims.

The concepts of race betterment, eugenics, and euthenics play a significant role in the discussions surrounding ADEJA's mission. These ideas involve improving racial characteristics and applying selective principles to achieve societal progress.

• Definition: Race betterment refers to the idea of enhancing racial characteristics through selective breeding or other means.
• Controversies: This concept is controversial due to its historical association with discriminatory practices and ethical concerns.

• Definition: Eugenics involves improving the genetic quality of a population through selective breeding and other methods.
• Historical Context: Eugenics has been associated with harmful practices and ideologies, raising ethical concerns about its application in contemporary contexts.

• Definition: Euthenics focuses on improving the environment and living conditions to enhance human well-being and development.
• Application: While less controversial than eugenics, euthenics still raises questions about its role in reparatory justice.

The UK plays a crucial role in ADEJA's mission, particularly in terms of aligning with British values and utilizing race codes for reparatory justice.

The UK employs a system of race codes, including IC1 (White Northern European) and IC3 (Black), for various administrative and statistical purposes. ADEJA's use of these codes is intended to clarify identity and facilitate reparatory justice claims.

The UK's Protected Characteristics include race, which is recognized as a fundamental aspect of individual identity and rights. ADEJA's alignment with these codes reflects their commitment to preserving and utilizing racial classifications for reparations.

ADEJA's approach is framed within the context of British values, including the commitment to combating discrimination and promoting equality. The preservation of racial identity through these values is seen as crucial for national security and social cohesion.

John Canoe's race map and chart are integral to ADEJA's strategy, providing a visual representation of racial classifications and their application in reparatory justice.

• Design: The race map and chart created by John Canoe outline various racial categories and their intersections with the UK's race codes.
• Purpose: This tool is designed to clarify racial identities and facilitate the distribution of reparations based on these classifications.

The race map and chart are intended to work seamlessly with the UK's existing race classification system, ensuring consistency and clarity in ADEJA's reparatory justice efforts.

The debate surrounding race betterment, eugenics, and euthenics is central to ADEJA's discussions. Both sides present compelling arguments for and against these concepts.

• Enhanced Identity: Group A argues that race betterment can enhance racial identity and strengthen claims for reparatory justice.
• Societal Progress: They believe that applying eugenic principles can lead to societal improvements and better living conditions.

• Ethical Concerns: Critics argue that race betterment and eugenics raise significant ethical issues, including the risk of discrimination and human rights violations.
• Historical Injustices: The historical misuse of these concepts is a major concern, potentially undermining the legitimacy of reparatory justice efforts.

• Ethical Integrity: Group B's cautious approach emphasizes the importance of maintaining ethical standards and avoiding discriminatory practices.
• Historical Awareness: They stress the need to acknowledge and learn from historical injustices to avoid repeating them.

• Delayed Progress: Critics argue that Group B's cautious approach may delay the establishment of effective reparatory justice mechanisms.
• Lack of Clarity: Without clear racial classifications, it may be challenging to facilitate reparatory justice claims effectively.

The ADEJA weekly discussion meetings around London are a hotbed of debate and controversy, centering on the figure of John Canoe/Junkanoo and the broader themes of race betterment, eugenics, and euthenics. As the movement prepares to celebrate the birthday of John Canoe/Junkanoo on 9th November 2025 and launch an international Black entity for reparatory justice, the discussions continue to evolve. The arguments presented by Group A and Group B reflect the complexity and sensitivity of these issues, highlighting the need for a balanced and ethical approach to reparatory justice. As ADEJA moves forward, the integration of British values and the application of race codes will remain central to their mission, aiming to secure a just and equitable future for Black and Mixed-Black individuals worldwide.

Host or Publisher John Canoe